Fallacies in the Study of Early Israel: an Onomastic Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
This study considers the question of the origin of Israel and the interpretation of archaeological evidence for Palestinian hill country culture during the transition from the Late Bronze Age to the Early Iron Age. While new research has enhanced our understanding of the period, it is important to maintain methodological controls in certain areas. This includes the careful evaluation of archaeological and textual evidence without a preconceived bias which automatically assigns a priority to the material culture. There is also evidence for non-indigenous peoples in Palestine at this time. This balances assumptions that Israelites must have been ‘Canaanites’ with their origins entirely within Palestine. Evidence relating to these issues is discussed.
منابع مشابه
The Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Linguistic and Logical Intelligences and the Frequency of Fallacies and Evidence in their Argumentative Writing: A Gender-based Study
The learners’ ability to write a well-organized argumentative essay has gained prominence within the last decades. The multiple intelligences play a significant role in enhancing the precision of both language and thought during the writing process. The current study aimed at investigating the possible relationship between linguistic and logical intelligences and the frequency of informal falla...
متن کاملAn Exegetic Study on Moses` Purity in His Meeting with Haroun (a)
The verses 150 of A`araf and 92-93 of Ta Ha have described Moses` rough meeting with Haroun after Israel sons` turning to calf worshipping. The verses have contained one of the most challengeable problems in the holy Quran. Many analyses have been presented on the meeting, yet it seems that the meeting has been made for awakening Israel sons. As is understood the main aim of the meeting has bee...
متن کاملExploring the Quranic Principles of Imam Khomeini's View Points on Israel as a Canceric Gland
Famous Imam Khomeini's view, the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the similsrity of Israel to a canceric gland and its pursuit as a permanent policy of the system, since the beginning of the victory of the revolution so far, has always been challenging and has brought problems internationally and doubts inside the country. Considering the recent developments in the field of internati...
متن کاملHearing is Believing: A Perspective-dependent Account of the Fallacies
In an earlier project, I have attempted a description of ‘fallacy’ in terms of a “bad process” between arguer and audience that occurs in the act of arguing. This involves the key feature of exploring fallaciousness from the audience’s perspective, considering ways that prevent the audience from fulfilling its role in argumentation, where it is unable to appropriately supply assumptions require...
متن کاملIsrael Advocacy in the Academic Field: The Case of Terrorism Studies
Research on the special relationship between the United States and Israel hasusually been focused on strategic aspects, whilst fewer scholars have focusedon non-material dimensions of the relationship. In addition, the existingresearch is mostly confined to the political and decision-making realms, withvery few excursions into the academic arena. The current article aims...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008